Kelly Curran

Since 1957, the William and Mary Law Review has published important scholarly work and has become one of the top general interest law journals in the country. Published six times per year—in October, November, February, March, April, and May—the Review has featured the work of noted scholars in all areas of the law. During the last decade, state and federal courts, including the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and D.C. Circuit Courts of Appeal, have cited the William & Mary Law Review more than four hundred times. This summer, Justice Alito cited to the William & Mary Law Review in his majority opinion in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, 140 S. Ct. 2049, 2060 (2020). Earlier this year, Justice Thomas cited to the Review in his concurrence, joined by Justices Alito and Gorsuch, in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, 140 S. Ct. 2246, 2264 (2020) (Thomas, J., concurring) and in his dissent in Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 140 S. Ct. 2183, 2231 (2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). Last year, Chief Justice Roberts cited the Review in his majority opinion in Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 2161, 2178 (2020), and Justice Kagan cited the Review in her dissent in that case, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor. Justice Alito cited to the Review in his opinion in American Legion v. American Humanist Association, 139 S. Ct. 2067, 2081 (2019). In 2018, Justice Ginsberg cited the Review in her dissent in Epic Systems Corporation v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612, 1647 (2018) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting), which was joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. In 2017, Justice Ginsburg cited the Review twice in her majority opinion in Microsoft Corporation v. Baker, 137 S. Ct. 1702, 1709, 1714 (2017).